FRAW site index
Free Range Library index

Free Range Library
categories:

Anarchism & Action

Climate Change

Croughtonwatch

Cyberwar

Direct Action & Protest

Economics

Energy

Electrosmog

Extreme Energy

Extr. Energy Climate

Extr. Energy Economics

Extr. Energy Nature

Extr. Energy Pollution

Extr. Energy Radiation

Food & Agriculture

FOSS & Linux

Hacktivism

Land Rights

'Limits to Growth'

Neo-Luddism

Nuclear

Peace

Peak Oil

Planning System

Politics

Simplicity

Technology

Toxics

Transport

UCG

UK Government

UK Parliament

Vegans/Vegetarians

Waste

50 most recently added files index

Free Range Library indexes last updated 15:41, 28/06/2018

This form allows you to search the resource IDs and resource titles of the files in the Free Range Library. If a full match to a key cannot be found, a list of partial matches is returned.

library logo

The Free Range Virtual Library:

Avoiding gas lock-in: Why a second dash for gas is not in the UK's interest

Green Alliance, June 2011


Free Range Library News & Events

10/04/18: Library database engine updated.

28/08/17: Library database engine updated (FRAW Library should be listed on searches more easily now).

10/08/17: Further changes to the website architecture completed to allowed continued expansion of the library.

22/12/16: 14 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy, Climate Change and UK Government sections.

22/11/16: 60 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy section.

back to previous page

Resource information:
Resource IDgreenalliance2011
Resource titleAvoiding gas lock-in: Why a second dash for gas is not in the UK's interest
Author(s)Rachel Cary, Dustin Benton
Publication/ sourceGreen Alliance
Date publishedJune 2011
Summary text/ abstractThe first dash for gas, following liberalisation of the UK electricity market in 1990, was clearly in the UK's national interest, because it significantly reduced carbon emissions and electricity prices. Our research shows that a second dash for gas would not be in the UK's long-term interest as it will raise the cost of meeting the nation's carbon budgets. Gas will continue to have an important role as a flexible fuel in the transition to a low carbon economy. However, because the UK has already cut its emissions by switching from coal to gas, a second dash for gas could prevent us from meeting our carbon budgets or significantly increase the cost of meeting them. Relying on unabated gas which is cheap to build now doesn't lead to lower cost decarbonisation; it will simply load the cost of decarbonisation into the 2020s. It could also deter investment in technologies such as offshore wind and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), technologies in which the UK has a competitive advantage. Our conclusion is that the government cannot both govern for the long-term and allow a second dash for gas. It needs to begin to manage the gas generation market, both through its consenting decisions, support for CCS demonstration, and reform of the electricity market.
Library categoriesClimate Change, Energy, Extreme Energy, Extr. Energy Climate, Extr. Energy Economics, Politics
Download file(s):

file iconAvoiding gas lock-in: Why a second dash for gas is not in the UK's interest [251.9 kilobytes]
This file is not located within the Free Range Activism Website


back to previous page

[an error occurred while processing this directive]